Detranistioners are speaking out. Their stories are horrific.
One young woman has accepted a number of interview invitations and it’s heart breaking listening to the way things have turned out for her.
One of the best interviews I’ve heard so far is with Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychologist. Not only is he able to ask intelligent and respectful questions to draw out her story but he is able to provide relevant information and explanations for questions coming to mind for both the young woman and the audience.
There is so much more I can think to say but hearing the interview would be a better way to go.
One other interview that I would rate in second place for the interviews I’ve heard so far is with Glenn Beck. His interview was also compassionate and thoughtful. He is not a doctor, that’s why Jordan Peterson has the advantage.
Heart breaking, is all I can say.
There are others in the same position but Chloe is the one I’ve watched so far.
I was talking to my daughter about this whole subject the other day, in relation to my grandson’s high school. She tells me the subject is prevalent in our schools already. And like everywhere else neither parents nor the conflicted young people are not being given the full picture about the real risks and consequences of the drugs and radical surgeries.
The saddest thing for me was when Chloe said that if she had known the risks involved with this treatment, she would never have said yes to what the health professionals wanted to do for her.
She was twelve when she first started down this path.
Now, still a teenager, Chloe wants to tell her story to save others from what her life has become.
It sounds like handling these treatments as an adult is less traumatic but not necessarily by much.
My own observation was that the consequence discussion was graphic, very personal, and unexpectedly surprising. I would never have dreamed what would rise up to be a problem for her.
I hope many of you will watch this and pass it on to spare others who may be in the position of making a decision without benefit of knowing the real risks.